Australia responded that its measures were based on sound evidence, and that the available evidence confirmed that the Plain Packaging Measures were indeed contributing to their broader objective.[10] The panel sided with Australia, saying that the evidence before us, taken in its totality, supports the view that the TPP measures, in combination with other tobacco-control measures maintained by Australia (including enlarged GHWs introduced simultaneously with TPP), are apt to, and do in fact, contribute to Australia's objective of reducing the use of, and exposure to, tobacco products.[11] Are the measures trade-restrictive
Theyll be cursing you out and calling you a dumbass, but they will be there for you
Many of them require investment of time and money but I was willing to try anything
"Englewood to Oust Cigarette Vendors," New York Times , August 4, 1939, 11
And cunning design is no accident